Kathleen E Gilligan wrote the article “Temptation and the Ring in J.R.R. Tolkien's The Fellowship of the Ring” to provide her view on whether the book was a take on Christianity or not. It also discusses how the book itself is centered on the idea of temptation and the ways to succumb or to overcome the many tempting things we are presented with in our life. For example, Frodo is constantly tempted by the ring and succumbing to its evil nature. Gilligan, I feel, was trying to settle the issue with her point of view. The intended audience was anyone interested in the topic regardless of whether or not they had read the book or the article talked about by Anna Mathie because the author provided solid information from both sources used.
The thesis of the article is that the book The Fellowship of the Ring’s main idea or focus is temptation. The view of temptation also can sound like you are referring to Christianity because of Adam and Eve, King David and Bathsheba, etc. Temptation is almost the foundation of what Christians see as the “truth”. If Adam and Eve had not eaten the apple, we would live in a perfect world with no sin. Temptation from the devil caused this to not be the case. Because temptation is what started the stories of the bible it is understandable that temptation reminds us of Christianity/God. The idea that the book is written about Christianity or has a “hidden message” of Christianity is justifiable by the stereotype of Christians and the religion in general.
The author goes through the many different categories in where the reader could have been misled to believe that Tolkien was surreptitiously talking about Christianity throughout the novel. Gilligan begins with the overview of the story as a whole then breaks it down into the smaller components that make up the book itself. She mainly focuses on Gandalf and Sméagol and the different ways that they portray being tempted.
Gilligan makes really smooth transitions during her whole essay. Everything flows right into the next and it all feeds off of the thing placed before making it easy to follow. She also is very good at going back to her thesis from the first paragraph to keep the main ideas with you so that you remember the points being addressed. The transitions are generally the last sentence somehow relating to the first sectence of the next paragraph she wrote keeping the whole essay at a consistent flow that keeps you caught up and in tune with the whole theme of the essay so you did not lose focus.
The author does not build a strong ethos, they are very pulled out of the writing and make it seem like they are very professional while writing. The author is very straight forward but uses more of the other authors’ words to describe the different things being addressed and the categories of temptation and Christianity.